Side-by-side

Passenger Boarding Bridge — Tunnel Glass vs Mobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Jet Bridges / Passenger Boarding Bridges.

Cost of ownershipPassenger Boarding Bridge — Tunnel GlassMobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecPassenger Boarding Bridge — Tunnel GlassMobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)
Drive systemElectro-mechanical—
Tunnel constructionGlazed glass-panel walls—
Auto-level systemDual-sensor, dual-circuitry redundancy—
Anti-collisionBridge-to-bridge and bridge-to-aircraft protection—
Aircraft sealingFront closure system, weather-excluding—
Quality standardsISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, CE, TKDN—
Optional equipmentVisual docking guidance, 400 Hz GPU, pre-conditioned air, potable water—
ConfigurationTwo-tunnel and three-tunnel options—
Documented reference airportsHaneda, Hakodate, Yonago (Japan)—
Aircraft compatibility—ICAO Category C, D, E, F (all commercial aircraft including A380 main deck)
Tunnel sections—3 (standard telescoping configuration)
Lift system—Hydraulic
Docking mode—Semi-automatic (one push-button via APIS/A-VDGS integration)
Safety floor—Optional — spring-loaded fuselage protection
Drive type—Self-propelled apron-drive (bogie system)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →