Side-by-side

Passenger Boarding Bridge (Apron-Drive) vs Mobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Jet Bridges / Passenger Boarding Bridges.

Cost of ownershipPassenger Boarding Bridge (Apron-Drive)Mobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecPassenger Boarding Bridge (Apron-Drive)Mobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB)
Bridge typeApron-drive (self-propelled bogie)—
Tunnel configuration2 or 3 telescopic sleeve units—
Aircraft compatibilityICAO Code C–F (narrow-body to wide-body)ICAO Category C, D, E, F (all commercial aircraft including A380 main deck)
Cab height adjustmentHydraulic or electro-mechanical continuous adjustment—
Optional ancillaries400 Hz GPU, pre-conditioned air (PCA), potable water, VDGS—
Autonomous docking optionAI cabin-door recognition, ~50 s approach time—
Installed base4,000+ units, 200+ airports, 60+ countries—
Patent portfolio300+ patents including EP and US invention patents—
Tunnel sections—3 (standard telescoping configuration)
Lift system—Hydraulic
Docking mode—Semi-automatic (one push-button via APIS/A-VDGS integration)
Safety floor—Optional — spring-loaded fuselage protection
Drive type—Self-propelled apron-drive (bogie system)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Passenger Boarding Bridge (Apron-Drive) vs Mobile Telescopic Bridge (MTB) · Aviation Souk