Side-by-side

HPEM Effector vs SentryCiv

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipHPEM EffectorSentryCiv
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecHPEM EffectorSentryCiv
Effector typePulsed high-power RF + barrage jammer (combined unit)—
AntennaLarge horn antenna, wide lobe pattern—
Defeat modesVariable by range — electronics damage (close) / forced fail-safe (extended)—
Jamming bandsISM radio band + optional GNSS jammer—
Multi-targetSimultaneous swarm engagement via wide lobe—
Collateral riskLow biological hazard; low risk to friendly aircraft (manufacturer-stated)—
Cost per engagementZero expendable cost (reusable effector)—
Platform optionsStationary or mobile (truck-mounted confirmed)—
Sensor compatibilityCamera (auto target recognition), IR, radar, direction-finder—
Detection Technology—Passive RF — RfAI engine, non-emitting
Drone Models Identified—150+ models
Coverage Pattern—360°
Unit Weight (approx)—10 kg
Software Updates—Quarterly, OTA
C2 Platform—Sentry-C2 Civ
Integration Outputs—JSON; third-party API
Procurement Model—Subscription (SaaS)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →