Side-by-side

HPEM Effector vs SentryCiv

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipHPEM EffectorSentryCiv
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecHPEM EffectorSentryCiv
Effector typePulsed high-power RF + barrage jammer (combined unit)
AntennaLarge horn antenna, wide lobe pattern
Defeat modesVariable by range — electronics damage (close) / forced fail-safe (extended)
Jamming bandsISM radio band + optional GNSS jammer
Multi-targetSimultaneous swarm engagement via wide lobe
Collateral riskLow biological hazard; low risk to friendly aircraft (manufacturer-stated)
Cost per engagementZero expendable cost (reusable effector)
Platform optionsStationary or mobile (truck-mounted confirmed)
Sensor compatibilityCamera (auto target recognition), IR, radar, direction-finder
Detection TechnologyPassive RF — RfAI engine, non-emitting
Drone Models Identified150+ models
Coverage Pattern360°
Unit Weight (approx)10 kg
Software UpdatesQuarterly, OTA
C2 PlatformSentry-C2 Civ
Integration OutputsJSON; third-party API
Procurement ModelSubscription (SaaS)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →