Side-by-side

HPEM Effector vs Radar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipHPEM EffectorRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecHPEM EffectorRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR
Effector typePulsed high-power RF + barrage jammer (combined unit)
AntennaLarge horn antenna, wide lobe pattern
Defeat modesVariable by range — electronics damage (close) / forced fail-safe (extended)
Jamming bandsISM radio band + optional GNSS jammer
Multi-targetSimultaneous swarm engagement via wide lobe
Collateral riskLow biological hazard; low risk to friendly aircraft (manufacturer-stated)
Cost per engagementZero expendable cost (reusable effector)
Platform optionsStationary or mobile (truck-mounted confirmed)
Sensor compatibilityCamera (auto target recognition), IR, radar, direction-finder
G/ATOR frequency bandS-band (2–4 GHz)
G/ATOR antenna technologyGaN AESA
G/ATOR detection range>160 km (aerial targets)
G/ATOR coverage360° azimuth, 4D tracking
G/ATOR emplacement time~45 minutes
G/ATOR air transportSingle C-130 Hercules or 3× CH-53E
G/ATOR power60 kW generator (dedicated pallet)
HAMMR frequency bandX-band
HAMMR antenna technologyAESA (AN/APG-83 derivative)
HAMMR coverage360° on-the-move
HAMMR target classesGroup I and II UAS, rockets, artillery, mortars, aircraft
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →