Side-by-side

HPEM Effector vs Coyote C-UAS effector

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipHPEM EffectorCoyote C-UAS effector
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecHPEM EffectorCoyote C-UAS effector
Effector typePulsed high-power RF + barrage jammer (combined unit)
AntennaLarge horn antenna, wide lobe pattern
Defeat modesVariable by range — electronics damage (close) / forced fail-safe (extended)
Jamming bandsISM radio band + optional GNSS jammer
Multi-targetSimultaneous swarm engagement via wide lobe
Collateral riskLow biological hazard; low risk to friendly aircraft (manufacturer-stated)
Cost per engagementZero expendable cost (reusable effector)
Platform optionsStationary or mobile (truck-mounted confirmed)
Sensor compatibilityCamera (auto target recognition), IR, radar, direction-finder
VariantsBlock 1B (subsonic C-UAS); Block 2 (jet-powered kinetic); Block 3NK (non-kinetic, recoverable)
Block 2 speed345–370 mph (555–595 km/h)
Block 2 engagement range10–15 km
Block 2 loiter endurance~4 minutes
Block 2 warheadTungsten fragmentation, optimised for UAS structural defeat
Re-attack capabilityYes (Block 2)
Block 1B length24 in (610 mm)
Block 1B wingspan58 in (1,473 mm)
Block 1B weight13 lb (5.9 kg)
Launch methodRail/pneumatic box launcher (ground, vehicle, naval)
PropulsionSolid-rocket boost + turbine sustainment (Block 2)
Block 2 unit cost (public estimate)~USD 100,000
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
HPEM Effector vs Coyote C-UAS effector · Aviation Souk