Side-by-side

APA-ECO Series — Battery-Driven (Electric) Ground Power Unit vs UGA100 Pushback Gateway (Aircraft Station)

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Ground Support Equipment (GSE).

Cost of ownershipAPA-ECO Series — Battery-Driven (Electric) Ground Power UnitUGA100 Pushback Gateway (Aircraft Station)
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecAPA-ECO Series — Battery-Driven (Electric) Ground Power UnitUGA100 Pushback Gateway (Aircraft Station)
DC Output28.5 VDC / 600 A rated—
DC Peak Output2,000 A—
Battery ChemistryLiFePO4—
Battery Capacity Options192 kWh (APA-ECO 190) or 320 kWh (APA-ECO 320)—
Operating TimeUp to 10 h (APA-ECO 190), up to 7 h (APA-ECO 320)—
Enclosure ProtectionIP55—
Control Display10.1" touchscreen with remote control—
EmissionsZero (fully electric, no fuel)—
Model—UGA100
Type—Pushback gateway / aircraft station
Aircraft interface—Connects to aircraft interphone system
Form factor—Compact portable with lanyard
Display—Channel and battery level screen
Remove-before-flight light—Yes
Aircraft plugs—Customizable — various aircraft models
Role in system—Required only for cockpit / interphone link
Provenance—Inbertec GSE wireless catalogue (RFQ f9cfd705)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
APA-ECO Series — Battery-Driven (Electric) Ground Power Unit vs UGA100 Pushback Gateway (Aircraft Station) · Aviation Souk