Side-by-side

GE 360 Foam Wash vs Composite Structures

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipGE 360 Foam WashComposite Structures
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecGE 360 Foam WashComposite Structures
Active cleaning time3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs
Preparation and restoration~1–2 hours hrs
Drying window24 hours before return to service hrs
Personnel required2
Recommended interval (active programme)Every 250–500 cycles
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water washUp to 3×
Approved engine familiesGE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete
Total washes performed (to 2026)6,500+
GE90 annual fuel saving potentialUp to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
GEnx annual fuel saving potentialUp to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
Operational environmentIndoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required
Autoclave diameter5 m
Autoclave length6 m
Autoclave max pressure16 bar
Autoclave max temperature250 °C
Design approvalEASA Part 21 Subpart J (Design Organisation Approval)
OEM licence levelAll repair levels, OEM-licensed
Major composite assets in pool~1,100
Mobile repair capabilityCAIRE mobile autoclave system; AST Nacelles & Composites
Components coveredNacelles, thrust reversers, engine cowlings, radomes, flight control surfaces, CFRP primary structures
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →