Side-by-side

GE 360 Foam Wash vs Engine MRO Services

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipGE 360 Foam WashEngine MRO Services
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecGE 360 Foam WashEngine MRO Services
Active cleaning time3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs—
Preparation and restoration~1–2 hours hrs—
Drying window24 hours before return to service hrs—
Personnel required2—
Recommended interval (active programme)Every 250–500 cycles—
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water washUp to 3×—
Approved engine familiesGE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete—
Total washes performed (to 2026)6,500+—
GE90 annual fuel saving potentialUp to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft—
GEnx annual fuel saving potentialUp to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft—
Operational environmentIndoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required—
Facility area—15,000+ m²
Test cell thrust rating—100,000 lb
Annual engine capacity (Abu Dhabi)—300+ [confirm with supplier] engines/year
GTF facility annual capacity (from 2028)—350 shop visits/year
Al Ain test cells—2 × 12×12 m, 500+ tests/year
Engine platforms—V2500-A5, GEnx-1B, Trent 700, CFM LEAP-1A/1B, P&W GTF
Regulatory approvals—EASA, FAA, GCAA
Turnaround range—14–100+ days
TAT improvement from digital ops—15 %
Engines overhauled (to 2025)—830+
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →