Side-by-side

Pneumatic Comfort System (Air-Cushion Seat) vs ZIM Crew Rest Module

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft Interior Fit-Out.

Cost of ownershipPneumatic Comfort System (Air-Cushion Seat)ZIM Crew Rest Module
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecPneumatic Comfort System (Air-Cushion Seat)ZIM Crew Rest Module
Weight saving vs foam — Business Class1.5–3 kg/seat—
Weight saving vs foam — First Class3–5 kg/seat—
Cushion core materialWelded polyurethane foil—
Protective wrapNomex + Kevlar fire-retardant layers—
Surface material3D spacer fabric (moisture management)—
Drive motorBrushless DC vane pump (one per seat)—
Altitude compensationAutomatic via pressure sensors + software—
Cumulative flight hours (published)>175 million—
Cabin class applicabilityFirst Class, Business Class—
Installation location—Lower-deck cargo compartment (removable)
Occupancy type—In-flight rest berths (not occupied during taxi, T/O, or landing)
Regulatory compliance basis—FAR Part 25 / CS-25 special conditions (fire, egress, smoke detection, O2)
Design approval—EASA Part-21J (ZIM design organisation EASA.21J.449)
Removal—Removable to restore full cargo capacity when not required
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Pneumatic Comfort System (Air-Cushion Seat) vs ZIM Crew Rest Module · Aviation Souk