Side-by-side

Wingman (103/105) Drone Detector vs Radar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipWingman (103/105) Drone DetectorRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecWingman (103/105) Drone DetectorRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR
Detection rangeUp to 6 km
Frequency bands (with antenna)200 MHz – 6 GHz
Frequency bands (without antenna)2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz
Direction-finding accuracy±30°
Detection time< 10 s
Wingman 103 weight1,100 g
Wingman 105 weight840 g
Wingman 103 battery endurance14 h (no antenna) / 10 h (with antenna)
Wingman 105 battery endurance7 h (no antenna) / 6 h (with antenna)
Battery charge time1–2 h
Operating temperature−30 to +65 °C
Ingress protectionIP67
ATAK integrationYes
G/ATOR frequency bandS-band (2–4 GHz)
G/ATOR antenna technologyGaN AESA
G/ATOR detection range>160 km (aerial targets)
G/ATOR coverage360° azimuth, 4D tracking
G/ATOR emplacement time~45 minutes
G/ATOR air transportSingle C-130 Hercules or 3× CH-53E
G/ATOR power60 kW generator (dedicated pallet)
HAMMR frequency bandX-band
HAMMR antenna technologyAESA (AN/APG-83 derivative)
HAMMR coverage360° on-the-move
HAMMR target classesGroup I and II UAS, rockets, artillery, mortars, aircraft
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →