Side-by-side

Radar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMR vs Coyote C-UAS effector

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.

Cost of ownershipRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMRCoyote C-UAS effector
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecRadar layer — AN/TPS-80 G/ATOR + HAMMRCoyote C-UAS effector
G/ATOR frequency bandS-band (2–4 GHz)
G/ATOR antenna technologyGaN AESA
G/ATOR detection range>160 km (aerial targets)
G/ATOR coverage360° azimuth, 4D tracking
G/ATOR emplacement time~45 minutes
G/ATOR air transportSingle C-130 Hercules or 3× CH-53E
G/ATOR power60 kW generator (dedicated pallet)
HAMMR frequency bandX-band
HAMMR antenna technologyAESA (AN/APG-83 derivative)
HAMMR coverage360° on-the-move
HAMMR target classesGroup I and II UAS, rockets, artillery, mortars, aircraft
VariantsBlock 1B (subsonic C-UAS); Block 2 (jet-powered kinetic); Block 3NK (non-kinetic, recoverable)
Block 2 speed345–370 mph (555–595 km/h)
Block 2 engagement range10–15 km
Block 2 loiter endurance~4 minutes
Block 2 warheadTungsten fragmentation, optimised for UAS structural defeat
Re-attack capabilityYes (Block 2)
Block 1B length24 in (610 mm)
Block 1B wingspan58 in (1,473 mm)
Block 1B weight13 lb (5.9 kg)
Launch methodRail/pneumatic box launcher (ground, vehicle, naval)
PropulsionSolid-rocket boost + turbine sustainment (Block 2)
Block 2 unit cost (public estimate)~USD 100,000
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →