Side-by-side
HVM Glide Bollard Nano vs GS-21 Underground Sensor
Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in perimeter-security.
| Cost of ownership | HVM Glide Bollard Nano | GS-21 Underground Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | — | — |
| Lead time (weeks) | ?–? | ?–? |
| Delivery | — | — |
| Install | — | — |
| GCC airports deployed | 0 | 0 |
| Certifications | 0 | 0 |
Specs
Technical specifications.
| Spec | HVM Glide Bollard Nano | GS-21 Underground Sensor |
|---|---|---|
| undefined | — | |
| undefined | — | |
| undefined | — | |
| undefined | — | |
| undefined | — | |
| undefined | — | |
| Sensing modalities | — | External seismic line strings (pedestrian) + internal magnetic sensor (vehicle presence and travel direction) |
| External sensor inputs | — | PIR (pedestrian/vehicle presence + travel direction) and contact-closure |
| Radio | — | Built-in 5 W VHF, strong foliage penetration |
| Radio range | — | Up to 35 miles line-of-sight |
| Battery life | — | 1+ year |
| Output | — | Mechanical relay to trigger external devices (cameras, lights, sirens) |
| Security | — | Tamper switch |
| Timing | — | Real-time clock; programmable self-test messages and scheduled access windows |
| Compatibility | — | Legacy Vortex and Monitron systems |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.
The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
Ask the AI →