Side-by-side
IMAT vs Point FWD
Two Other aviation suppliers suppliers compared on Aviation Souk. Stats, certifications, and supplier-declared strengths drawn from the indexed profiles. Both compete in Other aviation suppliers.
Souk's data signal
Where the AI cites each one.
IMAT
Thin · 0%
Not yet enriched
Point FWD
Rich · 80%
4 products · 0 certs · 7 named installations
Named installations
IMAT
No named installations in supplier source.
Point FWD
Bordeaux AirportRotterdam The Hague AirportZurich AirportOslo AirportBrisbane AirportBrussels South Charleroi AirportAmsterdam Airport Schiphol
Top products extracted
IMAT
No products extracted.
Point FWD
Airport security checkpoint planning and designSecurity screening technology implementationTransition and compliance programme managementPassenger throughput optimisation consulting
Procurement comparison
The spec-by-spec breakdown.
| Procurement dimension | IMAT | Point FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | ES | DE |
| Headquarters | Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain | — |
| Founded · years in Gulf | — · Gulf tenure not declared | — · Gulf tenure not declared |
| Categories overlap | Both: Other aviation suppliers | Both: Other aviation suppliers |
| GCC airport installations | 0 indexed GCC airports | 0 indexed GCC airports |
| Certifications | Only here: ISO 9001:2015, ISO 14001 | None declared. |
| Flagship products | 0 flagship products | 0 flagship products |
| International airports | 3 indexed | 0 indexed |
| Tier on Aviation Souk | Indexed-only | Verified (data-rich) |
| Decision fork | If the tender requires ISO 9001:2015, IMAT has it on file. | If those certs aren't a hard filter, Point FWD is otherwise comparable. |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your brief.
The AI cross-references both suppliers against your specific tender — airport, certifications required, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
One form, two RFQs — buyer sends a single brief and both IMAT and Point FWD receive it through Aviation Souk.