Side-by-side

Airframe MRO vs GE 360 Foam Wash

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipAirframe MROGE 360 Foam Wash
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecAirframe MROGE 360 Foam Wash
Facilities8 hangars (US + Canada)—
CertificationsFAA Repair Station, EASA Part-145—
Aircraft familiesBoeing 737 variants, Airbus A320 family (incl. A321neo), Airbus A330—
Engineering officesIndianapolis IN, Greensboro NC, Singapore—
ServicesC/D-checks, structural & composite repair, modifications, aging aircraft, CPCP—
Backlog statusMulti-year (active expansions at MIA + OKC)—
Active cleaning time—3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs
Preparation and restoration—~1–2 hours hrs
Drying window—24 hours before return to service hrs
Personnel required—2
Recommended interval (active programme)—Every 250–500 cycles
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water wash—Up to 3×
Approved engine families—GE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete
Total washes performed (to 2026)—6,500+
GE90 annual fuel saving potential—Up to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
GEnx annual fuel saving potential—Up to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
Operational environment—Indoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Airframe MRO vs GE 360 Foam Wash · Aviation Souk