Side-by-side

Airframe MRO vs TRUEngine

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipAirframe MROTRUEngine
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecAirframe MROTRUEngine
Facilities8 hangars (US + Canada)—
CertificationsFAA Repair Station, EASA Part-145—
Aircraft familiesBoeing 737 variants, Airbus A320 family (incl. A321neo), Airbus A330—
Engineering officesIndianapolis IN, Greensboro NC, Singapore—
ServicesC/D-checks, structural & composite repair, modifications, aging aircraft, CPCP—
Backlog statusMulti-year (active expansions at MIA + OKC)—
Engine families covered—CFM56, GE90, GEnx, CF34, LEAP
Programme enrolment—Over 18,000 engine serial numbers
Participation cost—No charge to enrol or transfer
Residual value uplift (IBA study)—Up to 50% vs PMA/DER-maintained engines
Designation validity—Until next shop visit (requalification required thereafter)
Transferability—Fully transferable with no fee at ownership change
LLP designation—Back-to-birth traceability on discs, spools, shafts
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Airframe MRO vs TRUEngine · Aviation Souk