Side-by-side

Component MRO vs GE 360 Foam Wash

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipComponent MROGE 360 Foam Wash
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecComponent MROGE 360 Foam Wash
Approved part numbers32,000+
Primary facilities6 locations (US, Netherlands, Thailand)
Component categoriesAPUs, hydraulics, avionics, nacelles, fuel systems, flight controls, power generation, instruments, interiors
Nacelle joint venturexCelle Americas/Asia (with Air France Industries)
Rotorcraft capabilityHelicopter APUs
Regional reachAmericas, Europe (Amsterdam), Asia-Pacific (Thailand)
Active cleaning time3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs
Preparation and restoration~1–2 hours hrs
Drying window24 hours before return to service hrs
Personnel required2
Recommended interval (active programme)Every 250–500 cycles
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water washUp to 3×
Approved engine familiesGE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete
Total washes performed (to 2026)6,500+
GE90 annual fuel saving potentialUp to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
GEnx annual fuel saving potentialUp to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
Operational environmentIndoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Component MRO vs GE 360 Foam Wash · Aviation Souk