Side-by-side

Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs GE 360 Foam Wash

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)GE 360 Foam Wash
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)GE 360 Foam Wash
Regulatory approvalEASA Part 147 Approved MTO—
Training centres3 locations (Paris, Amsterdam, Norwich)—
Instructors71—
Licence categoriesPart 66 Cat A, B1.1, B2; type ratings—
Aircraft typesA320fam, A330, A380, B737/MAX, B777, B787 + regional—
Practical fleet access~400 narrowbody/widebody + ~200 regional aircraft—
Delivery modesClassroom, CBT, WBT, virtual, fixed-base simulator, hands-on—
Active cleaning time—3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs
Preparation and restoration—~1–2 hours hrs
Drying window—24 hours before return to service hrs
Personnel required—2
Recommended interval (active programme)—Every 250–500 cycles
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water wash—Up to 3×
Approved engine families—GE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete
Total washes performed (to 2026)—6,500+
GE90 annual fuel saving potential—Up to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
GEnx annual fuel saving potential—Up to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft
Operational environment—Indoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs GE 360 Foam Wash · Aviation Souk