Side-by-side

Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs AVIATAR

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)AVIATAR
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)AVIATAR
Regulatory approvalEASA Part 147 Approved MTO—
Training centres3 locations (Paris, Amsterdam, Norwich)—
Instructors71—
Licence categoriesPart 66 Cat A, B1.1, B2; type ratings—
Aircraft typesA320fam, A330, A380, B737/MAX, B777, B787 + regional—
Practical fleet access~400 narrowbody/widebody + ~200 regional aircraft—
Delivery modesClassroom, CBT, WBT, virtual, fixed-base simulator, hands-on—
Platform type—Cloud-based SaaS, modular
Core modules—7 (Condition Monitoring, Predictive Health Analytics, Line Maintenance Planning Optimization, Technical Logbook, Reliability Suite, MRO Management, APU & Cabin Temperature Monitoring)
Ecosystem partners—AMOS (M&E/MRO software), flydocs (digital records)
Customers—40+
Aircraft under management—5,000+
Data standards—Industry aviation data exchange standards supported
Data ownership—Operator-retained, secure interfaces
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs AVIATAR · Aviation Souk