Side-by-side

Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs Composite Structures

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)Composite Structures
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)Composite Structures
Regulatory approvalEASA Part 147 Approved MTO—
Training centres3 locations (Paris, Amsterdam, Norwich)—
Instructors71—
Licence categoriesPart 66 Cat A, B1.1, B2; type ratings—
Aircraft typesA320fam, A330, A380, B737/MAX, B777, B787 + regional—
Practical fleet access~400 narrowbody/widebody + ~200 regional aircraft—
Delivery modesClassroom, CBT, WBT, virtual, fixed-base simulator, hands-on—
Autoclave diameter—5 m
Autoclave length—6 m
Autoclave max pressure—16 bar
Autoclave max temperature—250 °C
Design approval—EASA Part 21 Subpart J (Design Organisation Approval)
OEM licence level—All repair levels, OEM-licensed
Major composite assets in pool—~1,100
Mobile repair capability—CAIRE mobile autoclave system; AST Nacelles & Composites
Components covered—Nacelles, thrust reversers, engine cowlings, radomes, flight control surfaces, CFRP primary structures
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs Composite Structures · Aviation Souk