Side-by-side

Airbus TETRA Infrastructure & Terminals vs IC-A25NE Handheld Airband Transceiver (NAV/COM)

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Tactical Communications & Data Links.

Cost of ownershipAirbus TETRA Infrastructure & TerminalsIC-A25NE Handheld Airband Transceiver (NAV/COM)
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecAirbus TETRA Infrastructure & TerminalsIC-A25NE Handheld Airband Transceiver (NAV/COM)
StandardTETRA (ETSI ETR 300 series), deployed in ~130 countries—
Core network modelsTaira 300 series, Taira 700 series (virtualised)—
Core network capacityUp to 1,000,000 users per core network—
Core network rack formatStandard 19-inch rack—
Core network commissioning timeReady for use within 2 hours—
EncryptionAES-256, dedicated Key Management Facility (KMF)—
Multi-tenancyFull logical network isolation per organisation—
Handheld modelsTH9, TH1n, THR9i, THR9Ex (ATEX), TMR880i (vehicle)—
TH9 frequency bands380–430 MHz; DMO 406–410 MHz—
TH9 IP ratingIP65—
Hybrid base stationTB4 — simultaneous TETRA, LTE, and 5G, up to 8 TETRA carriers—
Direct Mode Operation (DMO)Supported on all handheld terminals—
—undefined
—undefined
—undefined
—undefined
—undefined
—undefined
—undefined
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →