Side-by-side

Hose/Foam Carrier 3650 (MAN TGM 18.340 4x4) vs SUOLONG ECO SFFF 3%

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Fire Safety & Rescue.

Cost of ownershipHose/Foam Carrier 3650 (MAN TGM 18.340 4x4)SUOLONG ECO SFFF 3%
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications01
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecHose/Foam Carrier 3650 (MAN TGM 18.340 4x4)SUOLONG ECO SFFF 3%
ChassisMAN TGM 18.340 4x4—
Engine340 hp / 250 kW diesel—
GVW18,000 kg—
Foam tank3,400 litres—
Tank constructionStainless steel—
Foam pump425 l/min (PTO-driven)—
Dry powder250 kg—
Dry powder outlets2—
Hose carrying capacity36 x 30 m lengths—
Floodlight mast8.5 m, 8 lamps—
WinchElectric, 25 m wire rope—
Crew capacity6—
TransmissionAutomatic—
Foam type—SFFF — synthetic fluorine-free foam
Fire class—Type B (hydrocarbon)
Mixture ratio—3%
Specific gravity (20°C)—1.00–1.10
pH (20°C)—6.5–8.5
Viscosity (20°C)—≤50 mm²/s
Sediment—≤0.2 %
Expansion ratio—≥7.0
Expansion type—Low expansion
25% drainage time (20°C)—≥2.5 min
Freezing point—≤ −15 °C
Storage temperature—−10 to +55 °C
Shelf life—Over 10 years (per storage guidance)
PFAS content—None — fluorine-free (F3)
Water compatibility—Fresh and sea water
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Hose/Foam Carrier 3650 (MAN TGM 18.340 4x4) vs SUOLONG ECO SFFF 3% · Aviation Souk