Side-by-side

Boarding Bridge — Seaport Variant vs PAXWAY Fully Flat Model

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Jet Bridges / Passenger Boarding Bridges.

Cost of ownershipBoarding Bridge — Seaport VariantPAXWAY Fully Flat Model
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecBoarding Bridge — Seaport VariantPAXWAY Fully Flat Model
Drive systemElectro-mechanical—
Auto-level systemDual-sensor, dual-circuitry, continuous motion tracking—
Cabin floor alignmentAutomatically parallel to ship deck across tidal/draft range—
Front closureSeals rain and wind at ship interface—
Extension rampBridges residual ship-to-bridge gap, eliminates step hazard—
Optional safety systemsFire alarm, public address, interior CCTV—
Tunnel finish optionsSteel-panel or glass-panel—
Quality standardsISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, CE, TKDN—
Floor design—Fully flat, no steps or gutters throughout tunnel
Passageway—Wider than conventional due to gutter elimination
Accessibility—Wheelchair accessible — terminal to aircraft door
Preset Drive accuracy—50 cm – 1 m from aircraft door (standard feature on all PAXWAY)
Vertical range—4.3 – 8.2 m
Control panel—LCD touch panel; stores up to 7,000 operational/fault history messages
Cab floor adjustment—Adjustable angle to compensate gradient difference between tunnel and aircraft floor
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Boarding Bridge — Seaport Variant vs PAXWAY Fully Flat Model · Aviation Souk