Side-by-side

Cam-Flo Bag Filter vs PWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipCam-Flo Bag FilterPWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecCam-Flo Bag FilterPWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller
Filter class (turbomachinery)M6, F7, F9 (EN 779 / ISO 16890)
Efficiency range (general ventilation)MERV 11 / 13 / 16
Max airflow (general ventilation)2,500 cfm
Media (GT Hybrid)Hybrid glass-fibre + synthetic, coalescing capable
Frame materialsSteel, plastic (turbomachinery); steel, wood, plastic (general ventilation)
StandardsEN 779:2012, ASHRAE 52.2:2017, ISO 16890:2016
End-of-lifeFully incinerable
Cooling capacity per module35–246 kW (10–70 TR)
Maximum modules combinable16
RefrigerantR-410A (factory charged per module)
Compressor typeDual scroll per module, independent circuits
Evaporator typeStainless steel brazed-plate heat exchanger
Salt-spray corrosion rating5,000 hours
Heat-pump hot water output (optional)Up to 54 °C
BMS protocols (optional)BACnet, Modbus, LonWorks
CasingHeavy-gauge galvanised steel, electrostatic powder coat
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Cam-Flo Bag Filter vs PWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller · Aviation Souk