Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK YK Centrifugal Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YK Centrifugal Chiller
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YK Centrifugal Chiller
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling Capacity Range—250–3,000 TR
Cooling Capacity Range (kW)—879–10,550 kW
Real-World Efficiency (standard YK)—~0.20 kW/ton
Real-World Efficiency (YK-CP, R-1234ze)—~0.15 kW/ton
Peak COP (YK-CP)—23.4
Refrigerant (standard)—HFC-134a
Refrigerant (YK-CP variant)—R-1234ze(E)
Refrigerant Charge Reduction vs Flooded—Up to 40%
Evaporator Type—Falling-film, proprietary YORK design
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →