Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK YZ Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YZ Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YZ Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling Capacity Range—165–1,350 TR
Cooling Capacity Range (kW)—580–4,747 kW
Part-Load Efficiency—< 0.100 kW/ton
Maximum Part-Load COP—Up to 38 (minimum-lift conditions)
Annual Energy Saving vs Fixed-Speed Oil-Bearing—Up to 35%
Refrigerant—R-1233zd(E)
Refrigerant GWP—1
Refrigerant Safety Class—ASHRAE A1 (non-flammable)
Compressor Type—Active magnetic-bearing centrifugal
Drive—Integral variable-speed drive
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →