Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs PWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterPWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterPWMC / RWC Water-Cooled Chiller
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling capacity per module—35–246 kW (10–70 TR)
Maximum modules combinable—16
Refrigerant—R-410A (factory charged per module)
Compressor type—Dual scroll per module, independent circuits
Evaporator type—Stainless steel brazed-plate heat exchanger
Salt-spray corrosion rating—5,000 hours
Heat-pump hot water output (optional)—Up to 54 °C
BMS protocols (optional)—BACnet, Modbus, LonWorks
Casing—Heavy-gauge galvanised steel, electrostatic powder coat
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →