Side-by-side
DedroneTracker.AI vs FAAD C2 (Forward Area Air Defense Command & Control)
Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.
Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence
DedroneTracker.AI
by Dedrone
Multi-sensor C2 software platform that fuses RF, radar, video and acoustic feeds into a single AI-driven airspace operations picture with autonomous drone and pilot geolocation.
Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence
FAAD C2 (Forward Area Air Defense Command & Control)
by Northrop Grumman
The U.S. Army's programme-of-record SHORAD command-and-control software — fusing sensors, effectors, and real-time fire control onto a single screen for short-range air defence, C-RAM, and C-UAS on one architecture.
| Cost of ownership | DedroneTracker.AI | FAAD C2 (Forward Area Air Defense Command & Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | — | — |
| Lead time (weeks) | ?–? | ?–? |
| Delivery | — | — |
| Install | — | — |
| GCC airports deployed | 0 | 0 |
| Certifications | 0 | 0 |
Specs
Technical specifications.
| Spec | DedroneTracker.AI | FAAD C2 (Forward Area Air Defense Command & Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Drone identification database | ~300 models | — |
| Direction-finding accuracy | ≤2.5 degrees | — |
| C-sUAS test-event accuracy | 95 % | — |
| Vision-model mAP improvement (Pythagoras 1) | +24.3 % | — |
| Small-drone detection improvement | 14× | — |
| Sensor inputs supported | RF, radar, video, acoustic | — |
| Certified partner integrations | 20+ | — |
| Standards compliance | Remote ID (US / EU / JP); SAPIENT | — |
| Security certifications | US DHS Safety Act; Veracode; CPNI-rated | — |
| Programme of record | — | U.S. Army SHORAD C2 since 1986 |
| DoD C-UAS C2 designation | — | U.S. Secretary of Defense-designated C-UAS C2 system of record |
| Missions on one platform | — | SHORAD + C-RAM + C-UAS simultaneously |
| Operator interface | — | Single integrated air picture (SIAP); tablet-deployable |
| Architecture | — | Open, vendor-agnostic, non-proprietary |
| Sensor integrations (examples) | — | AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel, AN/TPQ-53, M-ACE |
| Effector integrations (examples) | — | Avenger, Patriot, Stinger, Fortem interceptors |
| Interoperability standards | — | JADC2 messaging; NATO air-defence architecture compatible |
| C-UAS operational experience | — | >8 years deployed |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.
The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
Ask the AI →