Side-by-side

PIR Passive Infrared Sensor vs HVM Glide Bollard Nano

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in perimeter-security.

Cost of ownershipPIR Passive Infrared SensorHVM Glide Bollard Nano
Price tier
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery
Install
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications20
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecPIR Passive Infrared SensorHVM Glide Bollard Nano
Sensing modalityPassive infrared (thermal barrier), detects moving targets and direction of travel
ArchitectureModule Core unit (integrated radio, GPS, battery) + interchangeable PIR module
PIR modulesThree variants - short, medium, long range - with different detection ranges and fields of view
SensitivityThree remotely configurable sensitivity levels
Dimensions (short module)63 x 74 x 185 mm
Dimensions (medium module)63 x 74 x 208 mm
Dimensions (long module)63 x 74 x 265 mm
Weight (short / medium / long)0.58 / 0.59 / 0.80 kg
Battery life30 days integrated rechargeable; 1-year battery option; external battery connectable
RadioIntegrated 1 km mesh-networked radio; node relays data from other sensors
ExpansionOne additional PIR module connectable to the Core module; PIR module can be remoted on cable or attached to any other Flexnet sensor via multi-connector
InterfacesInput/output signals
EncryptionAES-256; alarm data stored in device in radio-silence mode until retrieved
PositioningGPS for self-localisation
Anti-tamperBuilt-in anti-tamper with GPS
Operating temperature-32 to +71 degC
Environmental standardMIL-STD-810
EMC standardMIL-STD-461
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
undefined
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
PIR Passive Infrared Sensor vs HVM Glide Bollard Nano · Aviation Souk