Side-by-side

GE 360 Foam Wash vs Engine & APU Services

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipGE 360 Foam WashEngine & APU Services
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecGE 360 Foam WashEngine & APU Services
Active cleaning time3–4 hours (narrowbody) hrs—
Preparation and restoration~1–2 hours hrs—
Drying window24 hours before return to service hrs—
Personnel required2—
Recommended interval (active programme)Every 250–500 cycles—
EGT/fuel-flow recovery vs water washUp to 3×—
Approved engine familiesGE90, GEnx, CF34, CF6, GP7200; LEAP-1A/B service evaluation complete—
Total washes performed (to 2026)6,500+—
GE90 annual fuel saving potentialUp to 35,500 gallons / ~380 tonnes CO2 per aircraft—
GEnx annual fuel saving potentialUp to 15,900 gallons / ~70 tonnes CO2 per aircraft—
Operational environmentIndoor hangar or outdoor; no dedicated drainage required—
Engine families (current)—CFM56-3/5/7B, V2500, GE90, CF6-80E1, Trent 700
Trent facility (new)—Trent XWB-84/97 + Trent 7000 — operational 2027
Trent facility capacity—200 shop visits/year
APU types—GTCP131-9A/9B, APS3200
APU annual throughput—~120 APUs/year
APU authorisations—P&W Authorized + Honeywell Licensed Repair Station
AOG support—24/7
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →