Side-by-side
Falcon Shield vs Wingman (103/105) Drone Detector
Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence.
Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence
Falcon Shield
by Leonardo S.p.A.
Leonardo's modular counter-UAS system that detects, tracks, identifies and defeats Class 1 drone threats at ranges up to 5 km across fixed, relocatable and mobile installations.
Counter-UAS & Base Air Defence
Wingman (103/105) Drone Detector
by MyDefence
Man-portable passive RF drone detectors offering up to 6 km detection range and 14-hour battery life in a sub-1.1 kg IP67 body built to NATO military standards.
| Cost of ownership | Falcon Shield | Wingman (103/105) Drone Detector |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | — | — |
| Lead time (weeks) | ?–? | ?–? |
| Delivery | — | — |
| Install | — | — |
| GCC airports deployed | 0 | 0 |
| Certifications | 0 | 0 |
Specs
Technical specifications.
| Spec | Falcon Shield | Wingman (103/105) Drone Detector |
|---|---|---|
| Radar detection range (Class 1 UAS) | 5.0 km | — |
| ESM detection range (Class 1 UAS) | 1.5–4.0 km | — |
| EO identification range (Class 1 UAS) | 4.0 km | — |
| Guardian-EA RF jamming coverage | 400 MHz – 6 GHz | — |
| ESM frequency coverage (Metis Skyperion) | 30 MHz – 8 GHz | — |
| Radar coverage | 360° continuous or sector | — |
| EO payload | NERIO-ULR gyro-stabilised, thermal + visible + eyesafe laser rangefinder | — |
| Target class | Class 1 UAS (low, slow, small) | — |
| Deployment configurations | Fixed, relocatable, mobile (MSV), man-portable | — |
| C2 interfaces | IP, ASTERIX, SAPIENT, Data Link 16 | — |
| Operational modes | Silent (passive sensors only) and Active (all sensors) | — |
| Defeat modes | Soft-kill (directional RF jamming, GNSS denial, video datalink disruption); optional hard-kill (laser, kinetic) | — |
| Detection range | — | Up to 6 km |
| Frequency bands (with antenna) | — | 200 MHz – 6 GHz |
| Frequency bands (without antenna) | — | 2.4, 5.2, 5.8 GHz |
| Direction-finding accuracy | — | ±30° |
| Detection time | — | < 10 s |
| Wingman 103 weight | — | 1,100 g |
| Wingman 105 weight | — | 840 g |
| Wingman 103 battery endurance | — | 14 h (no antenna) / 10 h (with antenna) |
| Wingman 105 battery endurance | — | 7 h (no antenna) / 6 h (with antenna) |
| Battery charge time | — | 1–2 h |
| Operating temperature | — | −30 to +65 °C |
| Ingress protection | — | IP67 |
| ATAK integration | — | Yes |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.
The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
Ask the AI →