Side-by-side
Logplan vs Smiths Detection
Two Baggage Handling Systems suppliers compared on Aviation Souk. Stats, certifications, and supplier-declared strengths drawn from the indexed profiles. Both compete in Baggage Handling Systems.
Procurement comparison
The spec-by-spec breakdown.
| Procurement dimension | Logplan | Smiths Detection |
|---|---|---|
| Country of origin | DE | GB |
| Headquarters | Wiesbaden, Germany | Watford, United Kingdom |
| Founded · years in Gulf | 1988 · Gulf tenure not declared | 1851 · 30 yrs in Gulf |
| Categories overlap | Both: Baggage Handling Systems | Both: Baggage Handling Systems Only Smiths Detection: Security Screening · Airport IT & Operations Systems · X-ray & CT Baggage / Cargo Screening |
| GCC airport installations | 0 indexed GCC airports | 9 indexed GCC airports DXBDWCAUHDOHRUHJEDMCTBAHKWI |
| Certifications | Both hold: ISO 9001 | Both hold: ISO 9001 Only here: ECAC Std 3, TSA APSS 6.2, EASA, ECAC EDS Standard 3 |
| Flagship products | 0 flagship products | 6 flagship products HI-SCAN 10080 XCT · CTiX · iLane · iCMORE |
| International airports | 0 indexed | 3 indexed |
| Tier on Aviation Souk | Indexed-only | Indexed-only |
| Decision fork | If you only need Baggage Handling Systems, Logplan is the more focused pick. | If your scope extends to Security Screening, Smiths Detection brings that as well. |
Decide
Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your brief.
The AI cross-references both suppliers against your specific tender — airport, certifications required, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.
One form, two RFQs — buyer sends a single brief and both Logplan and Smiths Detection receive it through Aviation Souk.