Side-by-side

Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs Engine MRO

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Aircraft MRO / Line Maintenance.

Cost of ownershipTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)Engine MRO
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecTechnical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147)Engine MRO
Regulatory approvalEASA Part 147 Approved MTO—
Training centres3 locations (Paris, Amsterdam, Norwich)—
Instructors71—
Licence categoriesPart 66 Cat A, B1.1, B2; type ratings—
Aircraft typesA320fam, A330, A380, B737/MAX, B777, B787 + regional—
Practical fleet access~400 narrowbody/widebody + ~200 regional aircraft—
Delivery modesClassroom, CBT, WBT, virtual, fixed-base simulator, hands-on—
Engines overhauled (cumulative)—5,500+
Engine families—RR Trent 500/700/800/XWB, GE90, CF34-10A, CFM56, LEAP-1A/1B
Test cell thrust rating (HAESL)—130,000 lb
GE90 in-house repair schemes—400+
Trent in-house repair self-sufficiency—95%+
GE90 in-house repair self-sufficiency—75%+
Dallas facility size—290,000 sq ft
Dallas maintenance bays—36+
Regulatory approvals—EASA, FAA + Asia-Pacific, Middle East authorities
AOG support—24/7 on-wing, global
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Technical Training (EASA Part 66 / Part 147) vs Engine MRO · Aviation Souk