Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK CYK Water-to-Water Compound Centrifugal Chiller / Heat Pump

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK CYK Water-to-Water Compound Centrifugal Chiller / Heat Pump
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK CYK Water-to-Water Compound Centrifugal Chiller / Heat Pump
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling Capacity Range—300–2,500 TR
Cooling Capacity Range (kW)—1,050–8,800 kW
Heating Capacity Range—10,000–40,000 MBH
Heating Capacity Range (kW)—2,900–11,700 kW
Chilled-Water Temperature—42°F / 5.6°C
Hot-Water Temperature (max)—180°F / 82°C
Minimum Turndown—25%
Efficiency vs Boiler + Chiller—3–5x more efficient
Refrigerant Options—R-1234ze / R-515B (optional low-GWP)
Compressor Type—Two electric motor-driven centrifugal compressors
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK CYK Water-to-Water Compound Centrifugal Chiller / Heat Pump · Aviation Souk