Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK YDAM Air-Cooled Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YDAM Air-Cooled Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YDAM Air-Cooled Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling Capacity—3.5 MW
Capacity Density Advantage vs Competing Solutions—Up to 20%
Warm-Water Cooling Setpoint Support—45°C (GPU-compatible)
Cooling Medium—Air-cooled (zero water consumption)
Compressor Type—Magnetic-bearing centrifugal
Packaging—Fits on 53-foot standard flatbed trailer
Commercial Availability—Late 2026 (announced February 2026)
Refrigerant—R-1234ze (low-GWP)
Platform Basis—YORK YVAM
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK YDAM Air-Cooled Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller · Aviation Souk