Side-by-side

Durafil Compact V-Bank Filter vs YORK YMC2 Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in HVAC & Climate Systems.

Cost of ownershipDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YMC2 Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecDurafil Compact V-Bank FilterYORK YMC2 Magnetic-Bearing Centrifugal Chiller
Efficiency rangeMERV 13A – 16A (ISO ePM1-85% to ePM1-95% on NanoTech)—
Max airflow (ES³ Box)2,400 cfm—
Energy rating (ES³)5-Star ECI—
Footprint reduction (Compac Box)50% vs standard 12-inch filters—
FrameAll-plastic enclosing frame—
Media typeFine-fibre synthetic (standard); nanofibre (NanoTech variant)—
StandardsASHRAE 52.2, ISO 16890, Appendix J (NanoTech)—
Cooling Capacity Range—165–1,000 TR
Cooling Capacity Range (kW)—580–3,516 kW
Full-Load Efficiency—< 0.175 kW/ton
Part-Load Efficiency—< 0.100 kW/ton
Refrigerant Options—HFC-134a / HFC-513A
Compressor Type—Active magnetic-bearing centrifugal
Moving Parts Reduction vs Conventional—80%
Refrigerant Charge Reduction—Up to 30%
Cybersecurity Certification—ISASecure® IEC 62443-4-2 / 4-1
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →