Side-by-side

CX Quick Scan vs RCR-Tool©

Spec comparison for two products on Aviation Souk. Both compete in Terminal Design & Architecture.

Cost of ownershipCX Quick ScanRCR-Tool©
Price tier——
Lead time (weeks)?–??–?
Delivery——
Install——
GCC airports deployed00
Certifications00
Specs

Technical specifications.

SpecCX Quick ScanRCR-Tool©
Completion time~10 minutes—
OutputPersonalised PDF CX maturity report with strategic recommendations—
CostComplimentary—
Delivery formatOnline self-assessment via NACO website—
Assessment frameworkThree pillars: Strategic choices, Experience design, Experience mastery—
Follow-on programmeCX Accelerator — 30-day on-site diagnostic and roadmap—
Regulatory compliance—ICAO Global Reporting Format (GRF)
Sensing method—Wireless rain sensors — no cabling or civil works required
Sensor count (typical deployment)—3 sensors
Measured water depth range—0–15 mm
Measurement accuracy—±1 mm
Reporting mode—Automated, event-triggered and continuous, 24/7
Installation time—Completed between aircraft movements — no runway closure needed
Airports deployed—11+ airports worldwide
IoT integration—Evalan sensor-management platform (real-time precipitation feed)
Decide

Ask Aviation Souk to pick for your tender.

The AI weighs both products against your specific brief — airport, certifications, lead time, budget — and tells you which fits.

Ask the AI →
CX Quick Scan vs RCR-Tool© · Aviation Souk